Alcohol minimum price rejected by Scottish Parliament

alcohol, binge, concern, independent, supermarketThe Scottish Government has failed in a last minute bid to introduce minimum pricing on alcohol – but has voted for the introduction of a ‘sunset clause’ which would allow a test of the plans to see if the measure reduces excessive drinking.

The arguments from health secretary Nicola Sturgeon – who wanted to impose a 45p minimum price per unit on alcohol – were strong, but ultimately fruitless as MSPs voted 76-49.

Most of the big hitters in the industry are happy. Simon Litherland, managing director of Diageo Great Britain, said, for example: “As we have previously stated, we firmly believed minimum pricing was not an effective solution in tackling alcohol misuse. The debate has clearly moved on and now we can look forward to working collectively with other stakeholders in Scotland and the UK to support targeted interventions which can make a real difference to dealing with the problem of alcohol misuse.”

SABMiller also welcomed the decision, citing research that said that a move to 45p-per-unit would only see heavy drinkers reducing their intake by one pint a week.

But what are these other interventions that Simon Litherland mentions? We’ve heard that minimum pricing would be ineffective – but also that the Supermarkets would be the only winners where shops were concerned, at the expense of smaller convenience stores and independent retailers.

What can be done about what is undoubtedly a problem – without hurting smaller retailers?

About author
As editor of Retail Express, Stefan sees, first-hand, all the newest product launches and developments and gets to talk to everyone across the retail sector, from independent retailers to managing directors. He’ll bring you details of these day-to-day dealings and keep you updated on some of the most recent product innovations and developments that may, or may not, help you improve your offering.
1 comment on this postSubmit yours
  1. What was the point of passing the “sunset Clause” when the flagship legistlation minimum priceing was sunk and lying dead in the water.The Scottish parliament do not have people like Roy Turnbull to keep the house informed of the futile nature of such a vote. The Edvidence was not there or was shakey for the minimum pricing or the Labour ammendment on Caffiene content of alcoholic drinks to convince sufficient number of MSPs. The story was totally different last year when any bit of shakey evidence was enough to pass the tobacco display ban and the cries of foul play by the retailers went unheard.
    The strong alcohol lobby could teach a thing or two to the tobacco lobby.

Submit your comment

Please enter your name

Your name is required

Please enter a valid email address

An email address is required

Please enter your message

betterRetailing © 2012 All Rights Reserved | betterRetailing.com is part of Newtrade Publishing
Registered Office: 11 Angel Gate, 326 City Road, London, EC1V 2SD.
Registered in England and Wales No.454555